Pillar guide · Part 3 of 10

    The Expert's Overriding Duty — and Why It Isn't to You

    Here is the single most important thing to understand about your expert witness: their primary duty is to the Court or the arbitral tribunal — not to you, even though you (or the other side) may be the one paying their fee.

    By Garry Andrews2 min read
    • DIAC
    • arbitrateAD
    • SCCA
    • QICCA
    • BCDR
    • DIFC Courts
    • ADGM Courts
    • QICDRC
    • BICC

    Part 3 of a 10-part series for clients navigating a dispute before the DIFC Courts or in DIAC arbitration.

    Here is the single most important thing to understand about your expert witness: their primary duty is to the Court or the arbitral tribunal — not to you, even though you (or the other side) may be the one paying their fee.

    Where this comes from

    Under Part 31 of the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC), an expert giving evidence in DIFC Court proceedings owes a duty to help the Court on matters within their expertise, and this duty overrides any obligation owed to the party instructing or paying them.

    The same underlying principle shapes expert evidence in DIAC arbitration. The DIAC Arbitration Rules 2022 leave much of the fine detail to the tribunal's own procedural orders, but tribunals routinely require party-appointed experts to confirm their independence and provide a genuinely held opinion — often by reference to the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration.

    What this means in practice

    Your expert:

    • Must give you their honest opinion, even where it's unfavourable to your position, or only partly supports it
    • Cannot be instructed to reach a particular conclusion or to leave out facts that don't help your case
    • May — and sometimes must — acknowledge the strengths of the opposing party's position

    If the opinion isn't what you hoped for

    If your expert's opinion isn't what you were expecting, that isn't a sign they've done a poor job. It's a sign they're doing exactly what's required of them.

    Pressuring an expert to shift a genuinely held opinion is likely to backfire badly. It can be exposed under cross-examination, or surface later in a joint statement with the opposing expert (more on that in Part 9). And it can damage your own credibility with the Court or tribunal — not just your expert's.

    It's an uncomfortable adjustment for a lot of clients, especially early in a dispute. But experts who are allowed to do their job properly, independently, are also the experts whose opinions carry real weight when it counts.

    Next: Part 4 — Which Rules Apply: DIFC Courts or DIAC Arbitration.

    Who we work with

    For lawyers and in-house counsel

    Independent, tribunal-ready evidence that maps to the pleadings and the list of issues, with early sight of evidential gaps.

    Discuss an instruction

    For contractors and engineering firms

    Understand what a claim is really worth before you commit — and independent evidence that stands up to scrutiny if it proceeds.

    Talk to us about a claim

    For private clients and developers

    Plain-language advice on where the real exposure lies, and a clear basis for settlement or the next stage of the dispute.

    Arrange a confidential call

    Need a construction expert witness?

    Tell us about the dispute, the forum and the timetable. We'll complete a conflict check and come back to you promptly.

    Discuss an instruction

    Please do not send confidential documents until a conflict check has been completed.